From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 18 08:36:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85C4EF7C; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A5BC3B0E; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47FB43B98; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 03:35:53 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53F1BAD8.50705@marino.st> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:35:36 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guido Falsi , marino@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r365208 - head/www/squidguard References: <201408171718.s7HHIMRh017558@svn.freebsd.org> <9eead94ee58708b60a67fa030af7e2fc@secure.marino.st> <53F127D0.3060500@marino.st> <53F1B560.4090003@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <53F1B560.4090003@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:36:13 -0000 On 8/18/2014 10:12, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 08/18/14 00:08, John Marino wrote: >> Hi Guido, Squid 3.2 will be removed the same day as Squid 2.7. It's EOL >> too. >> Oh, and if that's not enough, squidguard is at risk of being removed >> anyway because databases/db4, of which it depends, is unstaged and >> getting removed. see: >> >> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/misc/screwed.maintained.txt > > Oops, sorry, I did not notice this much. > > I'd really like to see this solved, unluckily I'm unable to do this > right away, since I'm away from home. > > The squid port is a useful one for many people I think. > > So regarding squidguard is it required from me to put back the > deprecated line o can it stay as it is for a week or so until I'm able > to look at it properly? No, it's not required. It's for users and you'll have it fixed before squid32 is removed. Regards, John