Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 23:19:47 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: multimedia@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 259787] sched.h: unknown type name 'cpu_set_t' after 160b4b922b6021848b6b48afc894d16b879b7af2 Message-ID: <bug-259787-12827-3v3hyeMk7R@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-259787-12827@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-259787-12827@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D259787 --- Comment #15 from Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #14) If the ports' maintainers consensus is that _WITH_CPU_SET_T is useless I am more than happy to get rid of this kludge. Apparently adding sched_XXX functions cannot be done without some additional patching for ports, because we cannot be fully compatible with glibc. This was not obvious before the functionality was added, I use tcmalloc as some porting example there (and the goal is really D32360 membarrier(2) and D32505 rseq(2)). So whatever the decision is about _WITH_CPU_SET_T, I will do it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-259787-12827-3v3hyeMk7R>