From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 23 04:31:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2802437B401 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 04:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.65.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFF3E43FE5 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 04:31:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mdcki@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 30374 invoked by uid 65534); 23 Apr 2003 11:31:35 -0000 Received: from pD954E0ED.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO gmx.net) (217.84.224.237) by mail.gmx.net (mp006-rz3) with SMTP; 23 Apr 2003 13:31:35 +0200 Message-ID: <3EA679D3.2010005@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:32:35 +0200 From: Marcin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030419 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, pl, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Schultz References: <3EA5A870.4090808@jocose.org> <200304231121.58544.a.carter@intrasoft.lu> <3EA6775E.3060506@jocose.org> In-Reply-To: <3EA6775E.3060506@jocose.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: UFS2 now the default creation type on 5.0-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:31:38 -0000 Peter Schultz wrote: > UFS2 is 64bit, allowing it to work with massive hard drives. I don't > know if it's true, but UFS2 may be faster if you're working with really > massive files. > > There is no UFStoUFS2 that I know of. > Will "dump" on UFS and "restore" on UFS2 filesystem work then? Beocuse otherwise I could get caught in a system without proper backups.