From nobody Mon Dec  4 18:59:44 2023
X-Original-To: stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SkXz94zGSz52h2L
	for <stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 Dec 2023 18:59:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SkXz91G3Yz3VPM
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 Dec 2023 18:59:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.97 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <pi@freebsd.org>)
	id 1rAEAS-00000000MSL-0Jxf;
	Mon, 04 Dec 2023 19:59:44 +0100
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 19:59:44 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>
To: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-23:16.openzfs
Message-ID: <ZW4hoJEr1hayauMn@fc.opsec.eu>
References: <20231201031737.DF0231B942@freefall.freebsd.org>
 <ZWsI4SbNU2xPjaPF@marvin.hueftgold.tld>
 <ZW2P8xz046Eqo_0u@fc.opsec.eu>
 <445y1eaxiz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
 <20231204230246.f11fce2914500a99e094de0b@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-stable
List-Help: <mailto:stable+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:stable+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:stable+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231204230246.f11fce2914500a99e094de0b@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action;
	module=replies;
	Message is reply to one we originated
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	REPLY(-4.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4SkXz91G3Yz3VPM

Hi!

> On Mon, 04 Dec 2023 08:48:52 -0500
> Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote:
> 
> > Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> writes:
> > 
> > > I had thought that the ZFS fix is a kernel fix so that the kernel
> > > would also report -p1, but it does not. It might be because
> > > zfs is a kernel module, so the kernel itself was not really patched,
> > > but I might be wrong here.
> > 
> > As far as I can see, that seems exactly right.
> 
> As this kind of confusion caused by mismatch of patchlevel between
> kernel and userland arises from time to time, now would be the time to
> switch to keep patchlevel in sync between kernel and userland.

I'm fine with a little confusion if there's less churn during updates.

> What was worse this time was that a non-in-kernel-but-in-tree module,
> zfs.ko, is updated but kernel itself is not updated.

It happens not very much, so it really does not matter.

A note in the EN would be sufficient from my point of view.

-- 
pi@FreeBSD.org         +49 171 3101372                  Now what ?