From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 00:11:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9524B37B401 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from white.imgsrc.co.jp (ns.imgsrc.co.jp [210.226.20.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A4A43FDF for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:11:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by white.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1409340F2 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:11:48 +0900 (JST) Received: from black.imgsrc.co.jp (black.imgsrc.co.jp [2001:218:422:2::130]) by white.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AED40C1 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:11:47 +0900 (JST) Received: from black.imgsrc.co.jp (black.imgsrc.co.jp [2001:218:422:2::130]) by black.imgsrc.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E851E460E for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:11:47 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:11:47 +0900 Message-ID: <7mllwah0ek.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> From: Jun Kuriyama To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030610070407.GA27204@fit.vutbr.cz> References: <200306091636.h59GavDW043030@freefall.freebsd.org> <20030609195142.U581@korben.in.tern> <20030610064507.GA22617@fit.vutbr.cz> <7mn0gqh10y.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> <20030610070407.GA27204@fit.vutbr.cz> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.0 (Venus) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.4 Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531 Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD 5.1 Released! X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 07:11:49 -0000 At Tue, 10 Jun 2003 09:04:07 +0200, Cejka Rudolf wrote: > > When I'm looking top(1) status, sometimes cvsupd process has 600MB > > over memory size. > > I have seen big cvsup(d) memory usage (bigger than usual rsync), > when cvsup is run for the first time on mirror site, when everything > has to be synchronized and checked. Hmm. I'm preparing sub-collection of all FreeBSD-archive. But I'm not sure this naming scheme and separation strategy is good or not. I'd like to hear others' opinions. I hope it may help to reduce periodical synchronization... collection ------------------------------------------------------------ ftp-all same as FreeBSD-archive ftp-releases FreeBSD/releases/* ftp-ports FreeBSD/ports/* ftp-branches FreeBSD/branches/* ftp-development FreeBSD/development/* ftp-snapshots FreeBSD/snapshots/* ftp-CERT FreeBSD/CERT/* ftp-other rest of above -- Jun Kuriyama // IMG SRC, Inc. // FreeBSD Project