From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 19 02:25:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109AB16A4CE for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:25:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CC243D60 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:25:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dcornejo@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so253071rnk for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:25:01 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ggXdOPcnKoIEY/m/Xt70JJMnh8GGfX54FU7UwQXVkS6LeO1/E89NXBbcOn0kakl0yxB4wAs3Fm+PuhrF86GsjQ15LkJuQpY/Y8xAAZxnDQry2y5wxgCrpvQYzx6HOsu7HkXVWSj/Dy+kbZC/Ijwngm0dPmnt/roL4sx/3BkanSA Received: by 10.38.99.68 with SMTP id w68mr1907433rnb; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:24:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.164.57 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:24:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6b8e8f4f041018192472d46993@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:24:23 -1000 From: David Cornejo To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: PPSAPI on serial port broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Cornejo List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:25:09 -0000 Hi, I've just upgraded a beta 4 box to todays RELENG_5, and my ntpd is no longer working with my Oncore M12+T. I changed to use cuad1 rather that cuaa1, but no luck. I tried running ppsapitest and I get this: ppsapitest: time_pps_create: Inappropriate ioctl for device I tried it against ttyd1 also, but no change It looks like it's complaining about the PPS_IOC_CREATE Is this a bug or is this the way the sio driver is going to be? If so, what is the recommended alternative? thanks, dave c