Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:04:31 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        multimedia@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 251125] audio/jack: update to jack2 or add new port audio/jack2
Message-ID:  <bug-251125-12827-1s18ueTK2a@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-251125-12827@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-251125-12827@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251125

Goran Meki=C4=87 <meka@tilda.center> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |meka@tilda.center

--- Comment #3 from Goran Meki=C4=87 <meka@tilda.center> ---
Created attachment 219927
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D219927&action=
=3Dedit
jack.diff

I just took https://github.com/DankBSD/ports/tree/lite/audio/jack and made a
git patch out of it. It works incredibly more stable than jack1 on my laptop
and my studio machine.

It would be nice to have the patches upstreamed, but at this state where ja=
ck1
just fails to work with ardour6, I have no choice but to use this patch for
myself. Can we properly upstream this patch? I mean, legaly, respecting aut=
hor
and other possible non-technical issues?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251125-12827-1s18ueTK2a>