From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Mar 24 16:14:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net (maynard.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.243]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CBA37B7CC for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 16:14:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca6-109.ix.netcom.com [205.186.213.109]) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA00152; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 19:13:48 -0500 (EST) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id QAA24695; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 16:13:15 -0800 (PST) To: Will Andrews Cc: Maxim Sobolev , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/kdelibs11 Makefile ports/x11/kdelibs11/pkgDESCR PLIST References: <38DBFB29.20F25F5E@altavista.net> <20000324183603.C391@argon.blackdawn.com> From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 24 Mar 2000 16:12:30 -0800 In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Fri, 24 Mar 2000 18:36:03 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Will Andrews * Ok, then unless anyone else has any objections, the current state of * kdelibs11 port will remain as is regarding LIBTOOL. I think this is fine, except for one thing I'm not sure about since I'm not a libtool expert -- is there absolutely no way that a piece of software would try to read the .la files and try to do something sensible with them? If the answer to the above question is "there is no way", then this discussion is closed. :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message