From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 2 10:07:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656C116A525; Tue, 2 May 2006 10:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from proof.pobox.com (proof.pobox.com [207.106.133.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFD443D76; Tue, 2 May 2006 10:06:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from proof (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by proof.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C707920260; Tue, 2 May 2006 06:06:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mappit.local.linnet.org (212-74-113-67.static.dsl.as9105.com [212.74.113.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by proof.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CD3405FC; Tue, 2 May 2006 06:06:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lists by mappit.local.linnet.org with local (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FarmN-0007sc-0v; Tue, 02 May 2006 11:06:51 +0100 Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:06:50 +0100 From: Brian Candler To: lukem.freebsd@cse.unsw.edu.au Message-ID: <20060502100650.GB30251@uk.tiscali.com> References: <7bb8f24157080b6aaacb897a99259df9@madhaus.cns.utoronto.ca> <20060427093916.GC84148@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20060427145252.I75848@fledge.watson.org> <20060427143814.GD84148@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20060427154718.J75848@fledge.watson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Marcos Bedinelli , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen , Robert Watson Subject: Re: [fbsd] Re: [fbsd] Network performance in a dual CPU system X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 10:07:05 -0000 On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:38:39AM +1000, lukem.freebsd@cse.unsw.edu.au wrote: > Would it be possible to improve the behaviour of the TCP protocol > implementation so that out-of-order reception was acceptable? Possibly - but if your FreeBSD box is acting as a router, and it re-orders packets in transit to the rest of the Internet, then in principle you'd need to upgrade the TCP implementations on every other device in the Internet :-(