Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 May 2006 11:06:50 +0100
From:      Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>
To:        lukem.freebsd@cse.unsw.edu.au
Cc:        Marcos Bedinelli <bedinelli@madhaus.cns.utoronto.ca>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: [fbsd] Re: [fbsd] Network performance in a dual CPU system
Message-ID:  <20060502100650.GB30251@uk.tiscali.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0605011117210.14405@wagner.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU>
References:  <7bb8f24157080b6aaacb897a99259df9@madhaus.cns.utoronto.ca> <20060427093916.GC84148@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20060427145252.I75848@fledge.watson.org> <20060427143814.GD84148@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20060427154718.J75848@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0605011117210.14405@wagner.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:38:39AM +1000, lukem.freebsd@cse.unsw.edu.au wrote:
> Would it be possible to improve the behaviour of the TCP protocol 
> implementation so that out-of-order reception was acceptable?

Possibly - but if your FreeBSD box is acting as a router, and it re-orders
packets in transit to the rest of the Internet, then in principle you'd need
to upgrade the TCP implementations on every other device in the Internet :-(



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060502100650.GB30251>