From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 3 04:23:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA58137B407 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 04:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E916443FEC for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 04:23:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h63BNNE1035115; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 05:23:26 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 05:23:15 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030703.052315.32736625.imp@bsdimp.com> To: nate@root.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030701164231.M88547@root.org> References: <20030701103125.R87367@root.org> <3F021133.3040306@kasimir.com> <20030701164231.M88547@root.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: flo@kasimir.com cc: current@freebsd.org cc: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updated ec-burst.diff patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 11:23:40 -0000 In message: <20030701164231.M88547@root.org> Nate Lawson writes: : On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Florian Smeets wrote: : > I set hw.acpi.ec.burst_mode=0 in loader.conf but when i was trying to : > chek if it was set to 0 with sysctl hw.acpi.ec.burst_mode i got : : > : > flo@lappi [~] 15 #sysctl hw.acpi.ec.burst_mode : > sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.acpi.ec.burst_mode' : : It's a tunable, not a sysctl. So you can only set it in loader.conf. Are : there any messages when you boot with that in your loader.conf? Would you : please post a separate dmesg for that case? I personally think that all tunable should be read-only (or rw if possible) sysctls... Warner