From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 1 11:44:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91324106566B for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:44:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C488FC17 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so3062467pbb.13 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 04:44:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AqU0tD7NXTpGxSVCqhKSf4KqIcMSyT2rM/pZw+6W/XQ=; b=hH/yGq7XNBHy+hOc+udkd7HMwolGdhtRkYKcwkIoXrb745CmeEajDwr/7QdQMGmXR6 admS6B4H2790QfI6vwHQhjzsDTYoPCU/1O0qsFePRcbTTn1Qpuo7t+NzPjdrM1a+9nZl xrghBIL2EM5Zn1Ny2qyYg385HUHqkzcCwOfTtZdmuelcWGrB9pLjdm8PLeWvALehRYmf lSaXg4xFbXVyeMYG96JEvwP2UDGfPqnTG7+LY0RViNGni0C021bLM3ALiPc/aSUTYzIY H8t5kwikwFedla7GI5K3S5GYVCzBayPAaieHRrs9BfVrnj6mwFZef/ZC2qDxeCjDCqQs l81g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.134.71 with SMTP id pi7mr7848361pbb.91.1338551041029; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 04:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.79.1 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 04:44:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:44:00 +0100 Message-ID: From: Kaya Saman To: Wojciech Puchar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Oscar Hodgson Subject: Re: Anyone using freebsd ZFS for large storage servers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:44:01 -0000 > > and definitely do not use it if you will not have regular backups of all > data, as in case of failures (yes they do happen) you will just have no > chance to repair it. > > There is NO fsck_zfs! And ZFS is promoted as it "doesn't need" it. > > Assuming that filesystem doesn't need offline filesystem check utility > because it "never crash" is funny. > zfs scrub...??? Additionally ZFS works directly at the block level of the HD meaning that it is slightly different to the 'normal' file systems in storing information and is also "self healing"...... Though I'm sure that you knew all this and have found otherwise. I mean I haven't found any problem with it even after power failures and such and my machine has been up for nearly 3 years. Regards, Kaya