From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 10 18:11:16 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9242416A402;
	Thu, 10 May 2007 18:11:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from simon@benji.nitro.dk)
Received: from mx.nitro.dk (zarniwoop.nitro.dk [83.92.207.38])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B63513C45D;
	Thu, 10 May 2007 18:11:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from simon@benji.nitro.dk)
Received: from benji.nitro.dk (unknown [192.168.3.39])
	by mx.nitro.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057332D4D52;
	Thu, 10 May 2007 17:52:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by benji.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 2000)
	id 1C0AD100B3; Thu, 10 May 2007 21:52:12 +0400 (GST)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:52:12 +0400
From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <wkoszek@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20070510175210.GD1835@zaphod.nitro.dk>
References: <20070510134740.GA39021@FreeBSD.czest.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070510134740.GA39021@FreeBSD.czest.pl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06)
Cc: 
Subject: Re: We don't really need two FTP daemons
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 18:11:16 -0000

On 2007.05.10 13:47:40 +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:

> Could we decide if we really want to support lukemftpd(8) ?

Hey,

I think only having one ftpd in the base system would be a very good
move.  Both with my doc hat (I have seen mails about the different
config files etc.) and with my secteam hat (we have less software to
support).

Personally don't care much which ftpd is removed, but unless lukemftpd
has some big important feature(s) which is useful to many people I
agree lukemftpd is the obvious one to nuke.

So FWIW, a big vote from me to remove one ftpd.

-- 
Simon