From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 24 23:28:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702B7106568B for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EDC8FC0A for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6933 invoked by uid 399); 24 Aug 2009 23:28:29 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 24 Aug 2009 23:28:29 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4A932218.7050503@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:28:24 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman References: <20090824204645.681881CC09@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: <20090824204645.681881CC09@ptavv.es.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Nenhum_de_Nos Subject: Re: portmaster not ask for port deletion X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:28:33 -0000 Kevin Oberman wrote: > Just in case someone reads this and tries 'portupgrade -af', it also > will re-build all installed ports, whether they need upgrading. This is > the command to re-build ALL ports when the library versions get bumped > (as they did recently for 8.0BETA). > > To just update the ports that need updating, the command is 'portupgrade > -a', probably the same as in portmaster. Yeah, I should have been more clear. '-af' will do the same thing in both tools. Where it gets interesting is that when specifying individual ports on the command line portmaster does by default what 'portupgrade -f' does. > In either case (portupgrade or portmaster), read the man pages BEFORE > shooting yourself in the foot. Both can certainly do that. Agreed. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection