From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Apr 28 10:24:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA11889 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 10:24:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from webserver.smginc.com (webserver.smginc.com [204.170.176.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA11877 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 10:24:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adamt@smginc.com) Received: from smginc.com ([204.170.177.130]) by webserver.smginc.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-13723) with ESMTP id AAA115 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 1998 13:27:07 -0400 Message-ID: <354610D5.F9AC5362@smginc.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 13:24:38 -0400 From: Adam Turoff Reply-To: adamt@smginc.com Organization: SMG Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: YA NT vs UNIX article Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I haven't exactly been keeping current on -hackers or -advocacy recently. Apologies if this reference was posted before. "The new Unix alters NT's orbit" by Nicholas Petreley http://www.ncworldmag.com/ncw-04-1998/ncw-04-nextten.html Great, solid anti-NT arguments, noting the emergence of Unix on Intel, naming Linux and FreeBSD multiple times. He even cites better performance using FreeBSD or BSDI on the same hardware as NT. Considering that Petreley writes many Linux-based articles (mostly documenting his test cases with Caldera and RedHat), this was an extremely nice piece mentioning FreeBSD. -- Adam To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message