Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:00:20 +0100
From:      Robert Clausecker <fuz@fuz.su>
To:        Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 141releng-armv7-quarterly stuck in run-depends status for octave-forge-20241116: 34:28:33 for package build so far
Message-ID:  <Z6vWhI3t80fHY6q1@fuz.su>
In-Reply-To: <7E7100A8-FDC1-4636-8F06-3C7DC8A9AF50@yahoo.com>
References:  <0601C3C9-FABC-482C-A42B-0C707769D065.ref@yahoo.com> <0601C3C9-FABC-482C-A42B-0C707769D065@yahoo.com> <Z6syiwixIGol_8I9@fuz.su> <0792121A-3B7D-465F-A2BB-D2A095DF5A7A@yahoo.com> <Z6u9hchxHVE4GwGu@fuz.su> <7E7100A8-FDC1-4636-8F06-3C7DC8A9AF50@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Mark,

Am Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 02:15:38PM -0800 schrieb Mark Millard:
> >> Should the package be considered broken for armv7 until
> >> it is fixed to build in a normal time frame instead of
> >> an O(nē) tiem frame, just because it takes too long as
> >> stands?
> > 
> > Yes, please mark it as broken.  It's only a metaport, so no
> > functionality is lost by not providing it.
> > The underlying problem should be fixed.
> 
> I'm not a committer --or even a maintainer of anything.
> So I can not be the one to make the actual "mark it as
> broken" commit. Are you looking for a bugzilla submittal
> with a patch to add something like:
> 
> BROKEN_armv7=	armv7 builds are spending, e.g., 39:49:02 in an N-squared-process.
> 
> before the USES= line in the Makefile?

I have pushed a commit to this effect:

https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=4cd4fdcc05c390cbdf29bfed57e7ba000f7fd721

Yours,
Robert Clausecker

-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - for an encoding-agnostic world
/\  - against html email  - against proprietary attachments



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Z6vWhI3t80fHY6q1>