Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 13:10:18 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound (Was: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?) Message-ID: <20120708171018.GA81070@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <4FF9512A.8050803@FreeBSD.org> References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org> <20472.51031.308284.775990@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <07345CE5-EE3A-413D-84BC-C9DA63FCBB9E@bsdimp.com> <A9FF659A-4559-4F5A-8A89-2BF606043C5A@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF9512A.8050803@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 02:21:46AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/08/2012 01:03, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >=20 > > On 8. Jul 2012, at 02:44 , Warner Losh wrote: > >=20 > >> > >> On Jul 7, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote: > >>> <<On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 16:17:53 -0700, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>= said: > >>> > >>>> BIND in the base today comes with a full-featured local resolver > >>>> configuration, which I'm confident that Dag-Erling can do for unbound > >>>> (and which I would be glad to assist with if needed). Other than tha= t, > >>>> what integration are you concerned about? > >>> > >>> The utilities (specifically host(1) and dig(1)) are the only > >>> user-visible interfaces I care about. I don't see any need for there > >>> to be an authoritative name server in the base system. So long as the > >>> resolver works properly and does DNSsec validation.... > >> > >> The only reason I want it in the base system is that ports don't cross= build very well, but the base system does. That's a weak +1 for keeping s= omething in the base system, but I'll be the first to admit it is a second = or third tier argument at best. > >=20 > > The real reason you want exactly these tools in base is that otherwise = you > > end up rewriting tiny parts of freebsd-update etc that actually depend = on > > host, etc. to query SRV for SRV records. >=20 > That's an implementation issue, and is easily handled with drill, or the > host-like program we all agree is a really-nice-to-have. >=20 =46rom first impression it seems that drill(1) has a syntax that leaves something to be desired like the eased use of host or dig. Specifically and not trying to make this thread about such but "+trace +short" styles just simply do not exist. I suppose a wrapper could be written to parse thoise syntaxes into there correct meaning dig.sh host.sh but thatd be one hell of a compatability problem rather than just having bind-tools in base. --=20 - (2^(N-1)) --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP+b75AAoJEBSh2Dr1DU7WWd4IAJjXprOy+6oIZtqz//+f0Qz4 hlaMJQ1PlLQmAeUltxTQaK+yoZh7XH+uPFprm+dR3e3HQZe1Aif0n1uqMwJwp+WU XRSzJW1elnSPT9HCLaDW04zyl9E/pA8qpmhEaXhG+qM+mKcvdQnoJriQi23TnsiD yL+rZYGuNhCE9xVgsNvPyEoWaiUu1UknKV2GtA/LVUgmmKYKvdMVF0qiDeksZvF3 r07QIPZEwDSYoyhnUaa0YmcS1joQnKzaXC4dThQn4x+NXJCrJRh5Btrg7N4t8f36 VzSo6kkXVygzzf8ndxEXM2nz4oBdv4lU92caUnszh3a17dlo2Y1lJp0TRuA9elQ= =NBNb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120708171018.GA81070>