From nobody Wed Sep 15 23:19:01 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54A217C5A84 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 23:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mavbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qv1-xf33.google.com (mail-qv1-xf33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f33]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H8x474Whxz3JvN for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 23:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mavbsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qv1-xf33.google.com with SMTP id z12so3028343qvx.5 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:19:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=69e6QEF4TiF5dIVU832EmNKauEVc7CYOmDtapZMN0gc=; b=VJ6PLj+cv1hRUQfiqDutlAWgQNGz1EyEXmz51atCFK67uZCOP/wlIAPpWzN4VPCNvp 3rxlL5GlMg4M+CIoZk/XT5T8jM4X2i5Fn1zld8JRkY9HfBx3Wvsy1JsL5b9q0F6X+FAI y1pzjC/C2hqth/LhTmX47bW9Lc9qq/LVVDktQabvElCogB7X0wN0BldEmTtzRMRemraP gf6yBV8u8fpmU9Ipd+iREV7Zcm/c7EHIpscFWqakVwK5qOCiFe+wvb88Ybx6rOPGL8kP 20q0H7x1OkPxqG4HzGSaDrdVGUHrX9Rf6BrqLcWkQzRu30BeqyNksYaOv5xx3kIL9pjh uajA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=69e6QEF4TiF5dIVU832EmNKauEVc7CYOmDtapZMN0gc=; b=rMu89Kem1Isq6vA58zQt8yKeWZ7gq60RynOyn55tjnc61cMsq9AOZ4Rbgpad7YPgFw Dy09v1U49jqSoe5ThmsguSpaC5AHqW4QVrg6lBuiaDq8B/7XFxo7TbaptS+VMLVRefBr EKsHZpJrektW/3CStlrt9bRw1DZrRTMJZDxqESyVkZpHk1t8yVfoFMB2w4HtsF7Cd1um qd5IDWUHEU2J8QfSqcOBbXfYJjrEl4DLcekq8KAN0nq5bhtD+2/TV+RhHAkt2nBhxC2h IzsjFF+Hg68VxTQeL+zpkpJtIT/OMVwc/h+P87Ft323noI2aK0TsJHCdpE/H70UZvveX ohlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533biv35aE7T7Ubq48bFlz58QbSP2I/ga8C/6ELkhsou/+oJn9nx 7LHOfd7/V0g5OrVim3jrxl7Bgd2xsDA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyouuDAOlAgAGRTJnIWXTKLqLaml6IJ2q/j4k4myaWvx5kTqOLyR1XcycOn6EsVVAg3TzP55A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:148b:: with SMTP id bn11mr2369428qvb.67.1631747942893; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spectre.mavhome.dp.ua (104-55-12-234.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net. [104.55.12.234]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v8sm969821qtk.49.2021.09.15.16.19.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: ipmi0: Watchdog set returned 0xc0 (releng_13) To: mike tancsa , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List References: <51e58d7a-1b33-f7e3-13aa-3be5fee5c826@FreeBSD.org> <2c1ad9db-b92a-d0a8-b2ae-b3ffafc04604@sentex.net> <1f0d32e1-e907-080f-1669-65148c245dd8@sentex.net> <586b04b4-d9b7-1597-4c8f-9bbcb9255c5a@sentex.net> <8fcb399d-8f26-b7a2-bf60-414d4ea1006e@FreeBSD.org> From: Alexander Motin Message-ID: Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:19:01 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-stable List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H8x474Whxz3JvN X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 15.09.2021 15:52, mike tancsa wrote: > On 9/15/2021 3:49 PM, Alexander Motin wrote: >>> On RELENG_12 as of today, I still have the issue on a X11SCL-F board. >> What issues do you have there exactly? > > Oh, sorry, this constant spew to dmesg > > ipmi0: Watchdog set returned 0xc0 > ipmi0: Watchdog set returned 0xc0 > ipmi0: Watchdog set returned 0xc0 > ipmi0: Watchdog set returned 0xc0 > ipmi0: Watchdog set returned 0xc0 > > The initial attach looks as > > ipmi0: port 0xca2,0xca3 on acpi0 > ipmi0: KCS mode found at io 0xca2 on acpi > ipmi0: IPMI device rev. 1, firmware rev. 1.73, version 2.0, device > support mask 0xbf > ipmi0: Number of channels 2 > ipmi0: Attached watchdog > ipmi0: Establishing power cycle handler Status 0xc0 means "Node Busy. Command could not be processed because command processing resources are temporarily unavailable.". Some sources propose command retrial after delay, but considering it is reported regularly I suppose it won't help. Have you tried to reset the BMC, for example with `ipmitool mc reset cold`, may be it unstuck that "Busy"? -- Alexander Motin