From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 30 17:34:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77228106566B for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:34:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EF18FC17 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBUHYMkR057277; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:34:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id oBUHYMav057274; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:34:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:34:22 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Thomas Mueller In-Reply-To: <4d1c6625.MZdwaEoGnhqNcfOP%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> Message-ID: References: <4d1c6625.MZdwaEoGnhqNcfOP%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:34:22 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portmaster general questions and problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:34:24 -0000 On Thu, 30 Dec 2010, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Threads about portmaster and portupgrade status raise the question, what flags for portmaster are comparable to -R and -r for portupgrade? > > I might want to portupgrade a package and all its dependencies (-R), > or less frequently, all packages that depend on the package to be > portupgraded (-r). How would I do that using portmaster? I read both > man pages many times. Those look backwards to me. It's extremely rare for me to upgrade everything that a given port depends on (-R), but common to upgrade a port and everything that depends on it (-r). Anyway... as I understand the man pages: "portmaster ..." = "portupgrade -r ..." "portmaster -r ..." = "portupgrade -rf ..."