From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 5 16:59:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27D616A485 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:59:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lydianconcepts@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8160E13C4BA for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lydianconcepts@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1294008uge for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:59:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jrpEiXoqOvgHKGIVn4IcAn2Ha2lqSBKK2b8MOlzSKnXo+9IQ/ac2iBff6pqOiL00gXbF+nNdWulyoKnyFXOf2ALJ3+aE22tNEcXSzBT2FfoPlZDytEMKlOZcLQPHefDcIWl2He9uOzHbx+Szi1dsKhpNYbX4fdLLcCSnMiV22s0= Received: by 10.78.106.3 with SMTP id e3mr1113649huc.1170694795641; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 08:59:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.199.19 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:59:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7579f7fb0702050859k42c5e12h3a3f1e46793ca4f0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:59:55 -0800 From: "Matthew Jacob" To: "Eduardo Meyer" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7579f7fb0702050800x3b9fbc86j2908a2ee193d8713@mail.gmail.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with QLogic FC problem diagnosis (da0:isp0:0:0:0): lost device X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:00:00 -0000 On 2/5/07, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > On 2/5/07, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > Helpful information would be: > > > > a) Release > > b) Connection Topology > > > > It looks like you're going through a switch. Your short term solution > > will be to zone your box and the CX300 together excluding all else. > > > > A longer term solution is for me to MFC the new SAN evaluation code > > which is a bit less harsh. > > You are right, I am going through a switch. > It is a 6.2-STABLE as of Feb 2nd. > > Is this code scheduled to be MFC'd? > Yes, when it's got just a bit more mileage on it and I have time to monitor breakage that might occur. This is also with 24XX support. *Probably* toward the end of this month. As Wilko says, zoning is worth it unless you're explicitly sharing.