From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 16 22:09:09 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70384DC
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:09:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A1F600
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:09:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r2GM7FbE002305
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 17:07:15 -0500 (CDT)
 (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Message-ID: <5144ED13.7020808@tundraware.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 17:07:15 -0500
From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: NFS Performance: Weirder And Weirder
References: <5144BEB7.3090906@tundraware.com>
 <CAOgwaMuBY0Prye3DZFYUck3+GZeiJOFcCeF3+i=JBqO2FQWb3g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOgwaMuBY0Prye3DZFYUck3+GZeiJOFcCeF3+i=JBqO2FQWb3g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
 (ozzie.tundraware.com [192.168.0.1]); Sat, 16 Mar 2013 17:07:15 -0500 (CDT)
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
 information
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: r2GM7FbE002305
X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com
X-Spam-Status: No
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:09:09 -0000

On 03/16/2013 04:20 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
>

>
> With respect to your mount points : /usr1 is spanning TWO different partitions :
>
> /dev/ad4s1f    390G    127G    231G    35%    /usr1
> /dev/ad6s1d    902G    710G    120G    86%    /usr1/BKU
>
>
> because /usr1/BKU is a sub-directory of  /usr1 .
>
>
> If you create a new directory , for example /usr2 , and /usr2/BKU , and using this new separate directory for sharing , such as :
>
> /dev/ad6s1d    902G    710G    120G    86%    /usr2/BKU
>
> and
>
>    machine:/usr2/BKU     /BKU     nfs   rw,soft,intr          0  0
>
>
>   will it make difference ?
>
>
> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk


I just tried this and it made no difference.  The same file copied onto
the NFS mount on /usr1/shared takes about 20x as long when coppied
on to /usr[1|2]/BKU.



-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk     tundra@tundraware.com
PGP Key:         http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/