From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 18 06:38:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7DC0BCF; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 06:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-x22a.google.com (mail-ve0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 838DB2C27; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 06:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f170.google.com with SMTP id i13so377418veh.29 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:38:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZJ/YmDYVw0kv85eJuw72cfODUputhR5Kgjq5mFGIIF4=; b=oLbr38X2XI0Kix0O6zc3IrGHc3nOcSYUX6H239w3Tsn4uHIf/tnfL8U9YNoDRznzSN uLZTQQZZ40kuOGlqVX2E2CNPWgjkvFKTVkH6//iHSo08D38EbxbZ5VMfFF4tBExD4JhK USxDTixai3QbqRtp9WMhu4jt+UlYNLmKGm2qPnzDeZnOSXjeflNcMJDo01ck0/Gaj1px VRhMRmCkWm43bs6IlmpU/QxDM0BqO+BHUS3HiMsLMvLULuoTa3HHeVWUC28GkeZwbVIB cMuZcPsWgjISjkc28Z8cy5RdLNMfjoLJmaKz1J0gYmhr2A0VJr50vLgxNh8Ayz1xBwhF z5mQ== X-Received: by 10.220.99.73 with SMTP id t9mr5326vcn.76.1403073487481; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:38:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: cochard@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.228.38 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:37:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20140613121732.GA61092@behemoth> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:37:47 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -Oth4aLXiQfEpZ4KaTAAn0_Ktew Message-ID: Subject: Re: Suggestions for low-power gigE firewall? To: Artem Belevich , cnehren+freebsd-stable@pobox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18 Cc: FreeBSD stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 06:38:09 -0000 On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Artem Belevich wrote: > > > Any suggestions? > > ALIX apu1c may be an alternative: > http://www.pcengines.ch/apu.htm > > The board is a bit cheaper - $145/$160, according to > http://www.pcengines.ch/order1.php?c=4 > The downside is that it's got Realtek RTL8111E NICs. > > What do you mean by a "GigE firewall" ? Using only jumbo frame, lot's of hardware will be able to fill the Gb/s bandwitdh... but Internet traffic is not composed of only large packets. I confirm for a "home usage", the PC Engines APU can manage up to 154Kpps (about 437Mbs/s of IMIX) in routing and 114Kpps (about 324Mb/s of IMIX) with ipfw. But... 154Kpps is far from the line-rate gigabit (1.48Mpps). FreeBSD bench of the PC Engines APU here: http://bsdrp.net/documentation/examples/forwarding_performance_lab_of_a_pc_engines_apu Regards, Olivier