Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:04:07 +0100 From: "C. P. Ghost" <cpghost@cordula.ws> To: Alejandro Imass <ait@p2ee.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS License and Future Message-ID: <AANLkTikHZGKkpJ6itysN_qizhYUf8Tc3_MMqJUPJ60PY@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=EKpVrX2xc7oq%2Bp=RCVtUMUmcVYefj7G20yr-O@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTi=EKpVrX2xc7oq%2Bp=RCVtUMUmcVYefj7G20yr-O@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Alejandro Imass <ait@p2ee.org> wrote: > Maybe I should go back to UFS, CCD, GEOM, etc. instead of continuing > to support f***ing Oracle. ZFS was honestly very easy and seemed very > reliable and fast, but I would like the opinion and position of people > here on ZFS before I continue using it. Technically, as long as Oracle keeps supplying the source code for versions of ZFS above v28 (no matter how long it takes, i.e. maybe after releasing Solaris 11 (?)) under the CDDL, we should have no problems using that code in FreeBSD. Just note that FreeBSD is not yet at ZFS v28, though it seems there's a patch for that [*], and we can hope to see it integrated when it is ready. As a matter of taste, you're free to use whatever file system you like. > Many thanks, > Alejandro Imass [*] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-August/019541.html Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikHZGKkpJ6itysN_qizhYUf8Tc3_MMqJUPJ60PY>