Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 09:26:57 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: ponds!ponds!rivers (Thomas David Rivers) Cc: ponds!lambert.org!terry, ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!rivers, ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!freebsd.org!dyson, ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!freefall.cdrom.com!freebsd-hackers, ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!lakes.water.net!rivers, ponds!Artisoft.COM!ponds!lambert.org!terry Subject: Re: More info on the daily panics... Message-ID: <199611081626.JAA12197@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199611080143.UAA03593@lakes.water.net> from "Thomas David Rivers" at Nov 7, 96 08:43:45 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > The patch only prevents a condition from occuring instead of panic'ing > > when it does occur. Ie: it prevents one less error condition that can't > > be handled from needing to be checked, and then "not handled" (panic). > > Ok, then we can deduce that my panic was not from this condition, right? > (Since this condition can no longer occur, and I still get the panic...) This particular panic on this particular occasion, anyway. Do you export any FS's to NFS clients? I believe the similar problem to which David refers is a cascade error related to client usage of the VFS (there are too many possiblities at this point, frankly). The NFS, like the vfs_syscalls.c, is a client of VFS services. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611081626.JAA12197>