From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 27 02:54:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 886EA1065670; Fri, 27 May 2011 02:54:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 02:54:02 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Brooks Davis Message-ID: <20110527025402.GA2175@FreeBSD.org> References: <201105252314.p4PNEeV0010445@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201105252314.p4PNEeV0010445@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/ganglia-webfrontend Makefile pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 02:54:02 -0000 On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:14:40PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > brooks 2011-05-25 23:14:40 UTC > > Modified files: > sysutils/ganglia-webfrontend Makefile pkg-plist > Log: > In addition to arp-1, we need libconfuse and libpcre about to build. > Because gmetad is a RUN_DEPEND and requires them, abuse LIB_DEPEND here > even though these are technically build depends. Hmm, I believe "abusing" FOO_DEPENDS is pretty bad practice to follow without sufficiently compelling reason. In this case, what prevents you properly listing them as BUILD_DEPENDS? For users building from ports it would not make a difference, but packages will have sane dependencies, no (unless I'm missing something)? ./danfe