Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 15:20:27 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 273944] security/crowdsec: update to 1.5.4 Message-ID: <bug-273944-7788-Zl9PlTmaN3@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-273944-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-273944-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D273944 Robert Clausecker <fuz@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fuz@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Robert Clausecker <fuz@FreeBSD.org> --- The quarterly branch is still on Go 1.19. Is this version of the Go toolch= ain still supported? The quarterly branch should ideally only get bug fixes, n= ot new feature releases, but I'll leave it up to you. Please use ${TAR} instead of tar. I see that you have removed -mod=3Dvendor from the build options. Is this = option now supplied by some other means? FreeBSD ports must not fetch dependencies from the web during build and may not assume that internet access is possib= le. Please also check if you can switch to verbose builds (pass -v to go build). I really wonder why you can't just use the standard USES=3Dgo build target.= All your port does is build a bunch of Go binaries. This would also remove the need for your custom vendor tarball and much of the other weird stuff in it. Stage QA says: =3D=3D=3D=3D> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa) Warning: you might not need LIB_DEPENDS on libabsl_base.so Warning: you might not need LIB_DEPENDS on libre2.so While I was able to find a binary that links to libre2.so, I didn't find one that links with libabsl_base.so. Is this LIB_DEPENDS correct? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-273944-7788-Zl9PlTmaN3>