From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 21 05:55:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3ACF16A4CE for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E6B43D53 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:55:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BGHGC-0001wz-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:55:28 +0200 Received: from [217.227.155.3] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BGHGB-0008SI-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:55:28 +0200 From: Max Laier To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:56:25 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <20040421114802.GA4820@profi.kharkov.ua> In-Reply-To: <20040421114802.GA4820@profi.kharkov.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_iuohAobydf7l1mH"; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404211456.34624.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:e28873fbe4dbe612ce62ab869898ff08 cc: Gregory Edigarov Subject: Re: altq in main tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:55:30 -0000 --Boundary-02=_iuohAobydf7l1mH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 21 April 2004 11:48, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > I just wonder if there are any chances that altq will be in the main > tree in the near future? I work on altq integration on and off for a couple of weeks, yet the outcom= e=20 is unclear as the required locking for altq is not exactly easy to do. But = as=20 vital locking is a must-do item for any new subsystem these days, we will=20 have to see how it works out. Also there are some other items on my schedule which must be complete=20 beforehand. =2D-=20 Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet --Boundary-02=_iuohAobydf7l1mH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAhouiXyyEoT62BG0RApXDAJ9zajFOkwUoBENsbnazwQXWhQ5NEQCdH3au zYZbMq/lv10ERRfR7OpHhQk= =KZIf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_iuohAobydf7l1mH--