From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 07:58:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD2A16A41F; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 07:58:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5531E43D46; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 07:58:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 236472A74; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 02:58:34 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 02:58:34 -0500 To: Vizion Message-ID: <20050831075834.GA21200@soaustin.net> References: <200508251303.59453.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> <200508301010.27373.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> <20050830212342.GA32240@soaustin.net> <200508301615.53251.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200508301615.53251.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Mark Linimon , Herve Quiroz , freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How should eclipse be organized in the ports tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 07:58:35 -0000 On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:15:52PM -0700, Vizion wrote: > /usr/ports/eclipse/eclipsemainv[x.xxx] Holds the main eclipse ports > /usr/ports/eclipse/meta-eclipse[v.xxx] Holds eclipse plugins loader > /usr/ports/eclipse/plugins/ Holds the *.jar files > /usr/ports/eclipse/misc1 self contained eclipse ports > /usr/ports/eclipse/misc2 > /usr/ports/eclipse/miscN This is certainly much closer to what is in the existing system (given that the jar files would probably better be in plugins/files/*.jar). The name 'meta-eclipse' would probably be less confusing to me personally as 'eclipse-plugins-loader' or something, 'meta' is a term that can mean everything or nothing. And if you change 'eclipsemainv' to just 'eclipseY.Z' and 'plugins' to 'eclipse-plugins' then that's very similar to what we have now. Then there's the matter of whether all this needs to be its own category but I don't think I am going to try to talk you out of that idea. I'm not too fond of it, personally. mcl