From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 24 22:33:19 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD65D43
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:33:19 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de)
Received: from mail.ultra-secure.de (mail.ultra-secure.de [78.47.114.122])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E569119B
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:33:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 29270 invoked by uid 89); 24 Apr 2013 22:33:17 -0000
Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 29265, pid: 29267, t: 0.1075s
 scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.97.3/m:54/d:17081
Received: from unknown (HELO ?212.71.117.82?)
 (rainer@ultra-secure.de@212.71.117.82)
 by mail.ultra-secure.de with ESMTPA; 24 Apr 2013 22:33:17 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
Subject: Re: NFS Performance issue against NetApp
From: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de>
In-Reply-To: <8A0622F0-D9FD-493B-8BDF-82D1359463F3@hub.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:33:15 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7A4485B6-2300-4521-BAE7-04C9598FCC1A@ultra-secure.de>
References: <4F9A2AAE-938F-4FF5-A30C-72689D7F1F39@hub.org>
 <20130424093505.0f3e4415@suse3>
 <C643EE8D-5934-48EA-9305-EE6A07C5C897@hub.org>
 <C40EB001-4790-4BB9-A580-6D57D2CBC340@ultra-secure.de>
 <74CA0A5F-63EF-4B1B-B237-7A8DB76333A6@hub.org>
 <F9A66A1B-4C3A-4E7A-AF8C-88B3C93D33A1@ultra-secure.de>
 <8A0622F0-D9FD-493B-8BDF-82D1359463F3@hub.org>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:33:19 -0000


Am 25.04.2013 um 00:26 schrieb "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>:

>=20
> So, over 4x slower?
>=20


That's a good question.



> Can you send me what your mount options are in /etc/fstab?  I'd like =
to try that out and compare against the two above =85 and I do have the =
Intel card on the way, so see if that makes a difference =85 =20
>=20

They look like this:

10.10.91.226:/the/export /usr/home/customer/bla/data/project_archives	=
nfs rw,bg,rsize=3D32768,wsize=3D32768 	0


But it also looks like your NetApp gives better default performance than =
the SmartOS'ed DL380 (for a price <fG>).
So, I'm not sure if it will make any difference.

Can you remove the disks and install CentOS6 on another pair of disks, =
just for kicks?



Rainer