From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Sep 25 10:36:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415C837B422; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:36:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e8PHaKS29850; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:36:20 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Bosko Milekic Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, cp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: need advice, fsetown annoyances and mpsafeness. Message-ID: <20000925103620.W9141@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from bmilekic@technokratis.com on Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 01:36:47PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Bosko Milekic [000925 10:33] wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > > Question: You don't seem to be protecting the actual sigiolst list > > with a lock. What happens if you've got two different processes > > manipulating the list? Each one may be locked, but regardless, your list > > can still be trashed. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Nevermind, please disregard. > > *blushes* You understand that it's blocked by the lock on the process/pgrp right? :) -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message