From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jul 14 5:55: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFF337B400 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 05:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com (mailout02.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF34843E31 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 05:55:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd05.sul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 17Tity-00082x-07; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:55:02 +0200 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (520065502893-0001@[217.229.220.246]) by fmrl05.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 17Titi-0d3lj6C; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:54:46 +0200 Received: from Magelan.Leidinger.net (Magelan [192.168.1.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6ECsbx07950; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:54:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Magelan.Leidinger.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6ECsUxQ097775; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:54:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from netchild@Leidinger.net) Message-Id: <200207141254.g6ECsUxQ097775@Magelan.Leidinger.net> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:54:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: ports/39606: Updated port: audio/lame (3.92) To: cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020714122659.GF35142@gits.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender: 520065502893-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 14 Jul, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: >> Do we really need vorbis support in LAME? The support was intended to >> have a command line utility at a time where vorbis hadn't a good command >> line utility. > > don't know, but since the code may support it, I left the choice > to users. in other words, I hate incomplete ports... but, if you > want to get rid of vorbis support, no problem. I think we should at least make it off by default... >> >> +USE_GMAKE= yes >> >> It doesn't neet gmake. > > as a general rule, I always add USE_GMAKE in conjunction of > GNU_CONFIGURE because, sometimes, not everything is build > w/ a legacy make. I already got this issue w/ some ports > (don't remember they names), so, I prefer to prevent this > as a side rule. The actual automake does a good job in this case. I only had once problems without gmake. I can assure you that LAME builds with our make successfully (I'm responsible for the auto* stuff in LAME). >> >> +install-la: >> >> + @${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKSRC}/libmp3lame/libmp3lame.la ${PREFIX}/lib >> >> We don't need the .la file. > > well, I'm just doing what's other ports do. Only ports which depend on the new libtool do this. We try to not install the .la files. Bye, Alexander. -- 0 and 1. Now what could be so hard about that? http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message