From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 24 21:26:38 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB5316A4BF
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xmxpita.excite.com (nn2.excitenetwork.com [207.159.120.56])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAE443FB1
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jarthel@excite.com)
Received: by xmxpita.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110)
	id C5A2CBFD7; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:26:31 -0400 (EDT)
To: sub_0@netcabo.pt
Received: from [138.80.22.196] by xprdmailfe13.nwk.excite.com via HTTP;
	Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:26:31 EST
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any
	abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: ID = e7a9ac0efcc7ca2a9c193db8afe51341
From: "Jayel" <jarthel@excite.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: jarthel@excite.com
X-Mailer: PHP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20030825042631.C5A2CBFD7@xmxpita.excite.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:26:31 -0400 (EDT)
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: DCC send/receive and FBSD 5.1 using IPF/IPNAT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jarthel@excite.com
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 04:26:38 -0000


I have the following rules in ipnat.rules:
--------------------
rdr tun0 0/32 port 19995 -> 192.168.2.2 port 19995
rdr tun0 0/32 port 19996 -> 192.168.2.2 port 19996
rdr tun0 0/32 port 19997 -> 192.168.2.2 port 19997
rdr tun0 0/32 port 19998 -> 192.168.2.2 port 19998
rdr tun0 0/32 port 19999 -> 192.168.2.2 port 19999
-------------------

I also have the following rules in ipf.rules:
------------------
pass in quick on tun0 proto tcp from any to 192.168.2.2/32 port 19995 >< 19999 flags S keep state
----------------------

Do those rules looks okay for DCC send/receive?

How about setting up a DCC server running on port = 59 on 192.168.2.2/32?

Same rules as above but different port number?

Thank you

jayel

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!