From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 11 20:42:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39560667 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:42:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ABB92276 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1AB21B57 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:42:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:42:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=RV4XX+QVpVtl76szMNenop5A8CE=; b=paxvY pozkYQO+FVxQCzVMr54u+Sje7dJkqd7yoBf4KgcP+82cAfTwgR9XRDC7pzhsZKLd qyjr2TimV6lOITihWmboi94FU0ljAkJg2NL3lI9G8wGeUwdhxgiNozbUNNbKPW4Z 4xzCA/OklE16Xb5A1HSASSnb4D0/stku25ijHI= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 71D8E10C786; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:42:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1381524131.18383.32977989.102BAA48@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 7hUQsAX1lT+qWOjv4+T5SLGEWkg3ZJ/c+9yjCqcBjnnb 1381524131 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-ce174988 Subject: Re: ezjail and UPDATING20131010 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:42:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <525851CE.6010808@erdgeist.org> References: <20131011170340.47C726018E@smtp.hushmail.com> <1381512663.13242.32914813.65C2C03E@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1381513083.390908110.b6zxrgl9@frv34.ukr.net> <5258412F.7040301@erdgeist.org> <1381516978.924807986.pfyyx7nl@frv34.ukr.net> <52584CD1.8020707@erdgeist.org> <1381519020.168298097.2gv7zpen@frv34.ukr.net> <525851CE.6010808@erdgeist.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:42:13 -0000 On Fri, Oct 11, 2013, at 14:30, Dirk Engling wrote: > On 11.10.13 21:27, wishmaster wrote: > > > Yeah!? But do you think updating python in each jail this is the > > right solution? Freebsd-update in each jail?? What about when number > > of jails is 10 or about. My server is very high loaded and I use > > tunable custom kernel and world. > > Don't use jails then. Better go and order ten servers and use the > amazing features of ... well, d'oh. Puppet? > This is not the right attitude to approach this problem.