Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:20:53 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Philippe_Aud=E9oud?= <jadawin@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Rene Ladan <rene@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r335281 - in head: . audio audio/gnump3d Message-ID: <529C5F05.6020706@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <20131202093409.GA71618@tuxaco.net> References: <201311301102.rAUB2I21004889@svn.freebsd.org> <20131202093409.GA71618@tuxaco.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/2/2013 10:34, Philippe Audéoud wrote: > On Sat, 30 Nov 2013, Rene Ladan wrote: > >> Author: rene >> Date: Sat Nov 30 11:02:18 2013 >> New Revision: 335281 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/335281 >> >> Log: >> Remove expired port: >> 2013-11-30 audio/gnump3d: Development has been abandoned upstream >> > > Hello René, > > Excuse me but where is my approval? As maintainer of audio/gnump3d, i > marked it as deprecated and then i was aware that i have to delete it. > I was not at home this week-end, so I planned to delete it today. > Philippe, You marked the port expired "2013-11-30" which I interpret as "You have my permission to remove this port after this date". This is why people are terrified to fix other people's ports, even when the port is broken and the fix is obvious. Why do you make a big deal about garbage collection when you pre-defined the collection date? For one, I am happy Rene is doing this (mostly) thankless job. Thank you, Rene. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?529C5F05.6020706>