From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 24 15:57:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFD716A53B; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834184400D; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:57:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF682A8E7; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:57:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Pav Lucistnik In-Reply-To: <1064441327.776.7.camel@hood.oook.cz> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:57:03 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20030924225703.6AF682A8E7@canning.wemm.org> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ata-lowlevel.c ate my slave disc X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:57:04 -0000 > Hi, I want to report a regression in ATAng. It's exactly same problem > that Richard Nyberg reported on current@ 9 days ago. > > After updating to today -current, my system no longer see primary slave > hard drive. It's one year old Seagate 80 GB hard drive. FWIW, I have the same problem on my amd64 boxes at home. It will not see the drive if its in slave mode. It too happens to be a seagate. > If I revert a 1.10 revision of ata-lowlevel.c (#ifdef 0 a section of > probing code), the disc is back and works absolutely fine. I'll try the same later on. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5