From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 31 10:40:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237191065676; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:40:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D291D8FC1C; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:40:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4VAeoUS056291; Mon, 31 May 2010 04:40:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <20100531095617.GR83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 04:40:50 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <71B7DEC2-1ABE-4333-8C8E-02F899D2449B@samsco.org> References: <20100529130240.GA99732@freebsd.org> <20100530135859.GI83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <508DA8CE-749A-46B4-AF0B-392DB08CBBCD@samsco.org> <20100531095617.GR83316@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> To: Kostik Belousov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-50.0 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Roman Divacky , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 10:40:54 -0000 On May 31, 2010, at 3:56 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: >=20 > My personal opinion is that pushing the import now at the present = state > of clang makes a disservice to FreeBSD, and possible clang. Why not = keep > the glue on the branch as it is ? Motivated testers willing to help > definitely can checkout from the branch. Import can happen when we are > satisfied with the quality of new compiler, instead of discontent = about > old one. Who is "we", and what is their criteria? Are you speaking for the = entire FreeBSD project? Scott