From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Feb 12 15:31:46 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA02794
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 15:31:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usr11.primenet.com (root@usr11.primenet.com [206.165.5.111])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA02789
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 15:31:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from primenet.com (root@mailhost01.primenet.com [206.165.5.52])
	by usr11.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA20020
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:31:41 -0700 (MST)
Received: from conceptual.com (consys.com [207.218.17.187])
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA20078
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:31:31 -0700 (MST)
Received: (from rcarter@localhost) by conceptual.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id QAA09207 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:31:27 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:31:27 -0700 (MST)
From: "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@consys.com>
Message-Id: <199702122331.QAA09207@conceptual.com>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: iv-3.1 on 2-2-Gamma
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Even though it claims it's broken, it seems to build and work fine for
me after commenting out the BROKEN variable.  My apps are running, at
any rate.  Since it gave me a little scare (got a deadline here) when
I went about the humdrum process of rebuilding after upgrading to 2.2
and g++ 2.7.2.1, maybe the BROKEN message should be changed to something
like "Try it, it might work."?

Russell