From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 18 09:13:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05A7744A; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-x230.google.com (mail-oa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B295829F9; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m1so1159278oag.21 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:13:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AXOT6Ryvm4D94m7VNKxkTSesyxvSL0P3PkoowHY5U90=; b=pYkBSDr25itSjHrsqQ5ScJKdADHGAWkCx9E1jS4AxQZKHtfvaBsyT/yuWKsLfTAxzL EcMvGqCdKBVkes5IuWhF8+vl9pf1lm1I65oLfffNIJLA25EpsTLtm4GJUjh5jO2GfwQX XwvRWHYUwRJc7ruWZmm3/LYHgyJ1dC6fBP6anEg2DsRrC86f4E0j5+l+2zkAjAAlZxLA z8xTxa4LzWd227WZhnH98sUJ9XFu+xUjs7DFU/LPxVj5CgpEPikYAv1oUv6zfIioZTUE 4GCJcHqYYWIUjo8ZYMxeqzC5ADEEtu0h2hGaWje/L5v1ukTTsH19RiwKFkcIdJ77RSud 0OQQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.81.99 with SMTP id z3mr551434obx.79.1403082782053; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:13:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.170.39 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:13:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <01E7F2B9-4334-442F-A748-2F0AEA2CF882@w21.org> References: <20140613121732.GA61092@behemoth> <01E7F2B9-4334-442F-A748-2F0AEA2CF882@w21.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 11:13:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Suggestions for low-power gigE firewall? From: Andreas Nilsson To: Juergen Nickelsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18 Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=C3=A9?= , Artem Belevich , Chris Nehren , FreeBSD stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:13:03 -0000 On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Juergen Nickelsen wrote: > On 2014-06-18, at 08:37, Olivier Cochard-Labb=C3=A9 = wrote: > > > I confirm for a "home usage", the PC Engines APU can manage up to 154Kp= ps > > (about 437Mbs/s of IMIX) in routing and 114Kpps (about 324Mb/s of IMIX) > > with ipfw. > > But... 154Kpps is far from the line-rate gigabit (1.48Mpps). > > Ubiquiti claims for their EdgeMAX routers to reach 1 Mpps with their > entry-level model (EdgeRouter LITE) and 2 Mpps with their bigger model > (EdgeRouter). They have maximum power requirements of 12 W and 40 W, > respectively. > > http://www.ubnt.com/edgemax > > I own the other entry-level device, with more ports and PoE (EdgeRouter > PEO), but don't yet have it in productive use (and would not able to atte= st > pps performance at that level anyway). > > It seems to be quite capable a device, but the Web GUI doesn't cover the > more interesting parts of its functions, and the documentation of the > command-line UI, which is modeled strongly after Juniper's, seems to be > less than fully complete, to say the least. > It sure does. And they have hardware forwarding. Thats how they get away with so "low spec" cpus. Best regards Andreas > > Might still work out if you are willing to find your way through it. I am > not yet fully convinced, but then I haven't found much time to do so by n= ow. > > Regards, Juergen. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >