From owner-cvs-all Wed Jul 11 14:57:34 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from silby.com (cb34181-a.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.14.173.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D404637B401 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:57:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 17755 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Jul 2001 21:57:30 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jul 2001 21:57:30 -0000 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:57:30 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Ian Dowse Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf NOTES src/sys/conf files options src/sys/ufs/ufs dirhash.h ufs_dirhash.c inode.h ufs_inode.c ufs_lookup.c In-Reply-To: <20010711163937.R2662-100000@achilles.silby.com> Message-ID: <20010711165558.Q2662-100000@achilles.silby.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote: > I did a few runs with "postmark" from the ports tree, and found that > performance was mostly unchanged. I'm not sure if it's a good benchmark, > but investigating why it shows no overall performance increase would > probably be worthwhile for you. A note hear: I may have been rigging the tests accidently. I was using runs of X files and 2X transactions. Now that I think about it, that might mean an average of 2 ops per file, which doesn't really let the cache shine. I'll try with a larger factor and see how it plays out. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message