From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 17 20:33:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6880B16A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:33:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0964043D58 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:33:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E539C1C00098 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:33:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CC9E81C0008C for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:33:51 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050217203351838.CC9E81C0008C@mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:33:51 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <224383192.20050217213351@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050217123730.O79252@makeworld.com> References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641B03@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <128456842.20050217185105@wanadoo.fr> <2810734464.20050217192707@wanadoo.fr> <20050217123730.O79252@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not... X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:33:53 -0000 RacerX writes: > Then show us your proof - I do. I have a section on my site dedicated to > FBSD as a desktop using various versions from 2.2.1 on up to 5.3-RC How do you prove that FreeBSD is suitable as a replacement for Windows? -- Anthony