From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 26 20:30:43 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8D91016A4CE; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:30:43 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5FEDA43D49; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:30:43 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from rizzo@icir.org)
Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9QKUhFm024261;
	Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org)
Received: (from rizzo@localhost)
	by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) id i9QKUhtb024260;
	Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rizzo)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:30:43 -0700
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@freebsd.org>
To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20041026133043.A24138@xorpc.icir.org>
References: <429af92e041020205510c66168@mail.gmail.com>
	<4177B899.5EC32F5F@freebsd.org> <429af92e04102114472add0e51@mail.gmail.com>
	<417835C7.7060808@freebsd.org> <429af92e04102404115bc7bc80@mail.gmail.com>
	<417BBE2C.A285792B@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <417BBE2C.A285792B@freebsd.org>;
	from andre@freebsd.org on Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 04:37:32PM +0200
cc: Vincent Poy <vincepoy@gmail.com>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Traffic Shaping not working correctly after ipfw coverted to
	use pfil_hooks API
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:30:43 -0000

On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 04:37:32PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> [bouncing over to Luigi]
> 
> Luigi, do you have any idea what might be going wrong here?

no, sorry... I have to say the ipfw/natd/dummynet configuration is rather
convoluted here so it is a bit hard to tell whether the
problem is in dummynet calls or divert sockets.

I am also confused by the numbers in the initial report:

> > > >>Vincent Poy wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>>However, after the latest -CURRENT upgrade, it will do 200KB/sec down
> > > >>>and 52KB/sec up.  If I only download only, then it does show
> > > >>>650KB/sec.  Normally, when I change the bandwidth to a number lower
> > > >>>than 480Kbps for the pipe, the download speeds would go up when
> > > >>>downloading.  However, I have tried in 10kbps steps down to 350kbps
> > > >>>but it still did not top 200KB/sec in downloading.

there is a mix of two different notations, Kbps and KB/sec, and
i cannot make sense of them.
Finally, I am curious as to why one would mix the upload and download
traffic, i believe *DSL data rates are independent in the two
directions unlike analog modems...

cheers
luigi