Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:07:28 -0500 From: Neal Hogan <nealhogan@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUI Suggested? Message-ID: <AANLkTi=sgw59A5ju8vvVooX=18rBAsGEyjr3invJZJ66@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C9BF868.9000805@gmail.com> References: <3368057398-783131724@intranet.com.mx> <20100923152023.GA14903@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <AANLkTikECugKYAg%2Bt%2BQv%2BSGBgdfSg4kR1eAQO1Yffq8U@mail.gmail.com> <20100924003120.GA19235@guilt.hydra> <4C9BF868.9000805@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com> wrot= e: > On 9/23/10 8:31 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote: >>> >>> If you like xmonad, check out scrotwm. It's inspired by xmonad, >>> lightweight, written in C by oBSD dev, actively maintained, and >>> vim-like (among other things ;-). >> >> Why is "written in C" considered such a great benefit by the Scrotwm >> developer(s)? =A0Earlier today, I read this on the site: >> >> =A0 =A0 "On the other hand xmonad has great defaults, key bindings and >> =A0 =A0 xinerama support but is crippled by not being written in C." >> hahahahahahaha! >> What's up with that? =A0How does Haskell "cripple" xmonad? >> In the end, you need not take yourself so seriously. The thread was generic enough to allow for some rhetorical flourish. I suggested something . . . pointed out that is written in C (as did the homepage) . . . AND you concluded some sort of insult; not my problem. Do you need a rim-shot for every joke?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=sgw59A5ju8vvVooX=18rBAsGEyjr3invJZJ66>