Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:36:36 +0100 From: Ulrich Spoerlein <q@uni.de> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USE_SDL Message-ID: <20030217113636.GD3801@galgenberg.net> In-Reply-To: <20030217060343.16587.qmail@web13505.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20030217060343.16587.qmail@web13505.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 16.02.2003 at 22:03:43 -0800, David Yeske wrote:
> I wanted to get feedback on USE_SDL. Most sdl ports have to redefine thi=
ngs like sdl-config,
> -lSDL, or SDL/SDL.h. Maybe USE_SDL in bsd.port.mk would save time, add c=
onsistency, and reduce
> duplication. This is only an example, and it has not been tested well.=
=20
>=20
> .if defined(USE_SDL)
> LIB_DEPENDS+=3D SDL-1.1.5:${PORTSDIR}/devel/sdl12
> SDL_CONFIG?=3D ${LOCALBASE}/bin/sdl11-config
> CONFIGURE_ENV+=3D SDL_CONFIG=3D"${SDL_CONFIG}"
> MAKE_ENV+=3D SDL_CONFIG=3D"${SDL_CONFIG}"
> SDL_LIBS!=3D ${SDL_CONFIG} --libs | ${SED} -e 's/.*\(-lSDL-[=
0-9].[0-9]\).*/\1/'
> .endif
Wouldn't it be better to finally get rid of the SDL Version <-> Library
mis-match?
sdl12 installs itself as sdl11 where nearly all ports want just sdl??
Why is that?
--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE+UMlDmArGtfDbn0QRAiP+AKCDr99b8lhWPSylIKOHNpvVrclTIwCgsNNt
U9RmZv77788bAIrMwhfOHkM=
=g9JD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030217113636.GD3801>