Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 Jan 2004 08:17:53 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        John Fox <readbsd@mind.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Viability of 5.X line for production use
Message-ID:  <20040106161752.GA19087@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040105174326.GD225@mind.net>
References:  <20040105174326.GD225@mind.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:43:26AM -0800, John Fox wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> We're planning some new mail servers, and until now I've been assuming
> that they would run under FreeBSD 4.X.  But it occurred to me this=20
> morning that the 4.X line is going to go away relatively soon, and that
> perhaps I'd be better off going with 5.X for these new boxen, as it
> would probably simplify the upgrade (keeping up with releases and bug
> fixes) process.
>=20
> So I'm wondering -- do the experts here judge 5.X as ready for use
> in a production environment, or would that be asking for trouble?

Wait for 5.2-R to come out, then wait a month or more for any
undetected serious bugs to get fixed in the release branch.  Then try
it on one machine and see how it fares.

Kris

--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/+t+wWry0BWjoQKURAhMvAKDiQP+Zqdr1AOlDdbw/rdwdeP83EACfXjq1
YGNxak35GLKpqyCxiLs8jXk=
=0QY5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040106161752.GA19087>