From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Nov 16 5:48:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from amanda.swlct.sthames.nhs.uk (hide14.nhs.uk [194.6.81.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A48614D05 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 05:48:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from greg@swlct.sthames.nhs.uk) Received: from greg.swlct.sthames.nhs.uk (qmh-00553.qmpgmc.ac.uk [10.1.20.82]) by amanda.swlct.sthames.nhs.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA37654 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 1999 11:20:43 GMT Message-ID: <00af01bf3025$955a27a0$5214010a@swlct.sthames.nhs.uk> From: "Greg Quinlan" To: References: <000001bf301f$c1c955a0$021d85d1@youwant.to> Subject: Re: Slapd (LDAP) Problems Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 11:27:36 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: David Schwartz > The distribution requirements for openldap are much more restrictive than > those for the old ldap. I'd hate to see the more retricted one replace the > freer one. > > DS > Sorry how so? See: http://www.openldap.org/software/release/license.html The only difference I can see is that the development of openldap, is as its name suggests, "open." That any modifications to the "core standard product" be publicly shared, and properly documented. Selling Openldap as a separate product is also NOT allowed. Selling support, Selling it as part of another product, Selling installation of it.....etc is permitted. Essentially your not allowed to steal-it call it your own!!! This is surely a good thing? Greg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message