From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 7 08:18:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C1316A4CE; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:18:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4628043D49; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 08:18:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i678IKdx078064; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:18:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i678IKvI078063; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:18:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:18:20 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman Message-ID: <20040707081820.GE28368@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200407020815.i628F5sp016504@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040702100347.GA9202@laptop.6bone.nl> <20040702161947.GI779@laptop.6bone.nl> <20040702191815.GM1034@green.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040702191815.GM1034@green.homeunix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI-CA 20040527 import X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 08:18:21 -0000 On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 03:18:15PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 06:37:09PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > Mark Santcroos writes: > > > Any idea why I'm not seeing it? > > > > Because you're not building with -O2, like you should. > > I think DES forgot to say "for testing purposes." Normal AMD64, Sparc64, and IA-64 kernels are build with -O2. For others "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing" is probably quite usable. > Also, why do we trust -O2 when there's still no assurance that the reason > it's broken with ppp(8) is a ppp(8) C bug itself? Why don't you trust 'gcc -O2' when the rest of the world can use -O2 and -O3 on their code bases?? (this includes large enterprise applications) -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)