From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 8 11:39:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543E137B6A0 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:38:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18]) by etinc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA42603; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:44:13 GMT (envelope-from dennis@etinc.com) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20010208142840.04044eb0@mail.etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@mail.etinc.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 14:47:38 -0500 To: "David Wilson" , From: Dennis Subject: Re: Transparent proxying with delay pools based on IP precedence bit Cc: , In-Reply-To: <009901c09064$3e267150$112821c4@pmb.sai.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 12:42 PM 02/06/2001, David Wilson wrote: >Hi guys, howzit going ? ;-) > >An nice juicy question: > >We are an ISP and we allocate our leased line clients subnets of IP's. >At the moment we use a Packeteer traffic shaper to limit our each of clients >international bandwidth to 16K international & 64K Local. >The Packeteer is able to distinguish between local & international traffic >because our bandwidth provider marks our incoming packets "precedence" >fields of all international traffic with a "2" and all local traffic with a >"0". just curious, is this a standard practice? we could do that in our etbwmgr product for freebsd. how does it handle outgoing non-tcp traffic? Dennis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message