From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 10 02:10:56 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72789F04
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 02:10:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31A8F369
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 02:10:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
 (envelope-from <freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org>) id 1XneRP-0005Jf-Tx
 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 03:10:51 +0100
Received: from dynamic34-29.dynamic.dal.ca ([129.173.34.203])
 by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
 id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 03:10:51 +0100
Received: from jrm by dynamic34-29.dynamic.dal.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1
 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 03:10:51 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
From: Joseph Mingrone <jrm@ftfl.ca>
Subject: comments for a pmake newb
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 22:10:37 -0400
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <86a93zpzz6.fsf@gly.ftfl.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dynamic34-29.dynamic.dal.ca
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ev5SNiAVgR92vCZHR9T74Ln94BU=
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 02:10:56 -0000

I'm porting a program that uses a simple GNU make file, but I'm thinking
about replacing the make file to remove the devel/gmake dependency.  I
don't foresee many upstream changes that will make this an issue.  Is
this a bad/good idea?  Are there any example ports that do this?  My
searching didn't turn any up.

My simple make file replacement is below.  If you have any suggestions
to offer, I'm open to criticism.

Thanks,

Joseph

PROG = blah
SRCS != echo *.c
OBJS = $(SRCS:.c=.o)

CFLAGS  = -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200809L -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 -pedantic -std=c11 -Wall
INC	= -I/usr/local/include
LDFLAGS = -L/usr/local/lib
LDLIBS  = -lX11

.ifmake debug
   CFLAGS += -DDEBUG -g -O0
.else
   CFLAGS += -DNDEBUG -O3
.endif

${PROG}: ${OBJS}
	${CC} ${CFLAGS} ${LDFLAGS} ${LDLIBS} $(.ALLSRC) -o $(.TARGET)

${OBJS}: ${SRCS}
	${CC} -c ${CFLAGS} ${INC} ${SRCS}

debug: ${PROG}

clean:
	rm -f ${PROG} *.o *.core