From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 01:07:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFE337B404 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 01:07:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from birch.ripe.net (birch.ripe.net [193.0.1.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA4B43FA3 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 01:07:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marks@ripe.net) Received: from laptop.6bone.nl (cow.ripe.net [193.0.1.239]) by birch.ripe.net (8.12.9/8.11.6) with SMTP id h4S87TVn008269; Wed, 28 May 2003 10:07:29 +0200 Received: (nullmailer pid 769 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 28 May 2003 07:06:46 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 09:06:46 +0200 From: Mark Santcroos To: Nate Lawson Message-ID: <20030528070646.GA733@laptop.6bone.nl> References: <20030527140327.E6550@root.org> <20030528071116.2db41659.yosimoto@waishi.jp> <20030527165526.E6842@root.org> <20030527171813.A6873@root.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030527171813.A6873@root.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Handles: MS6-6BONE, MS18417-RIPE cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2267] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 08:07:33 -0000 On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 05:25:27PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Tue, 27 May 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: > > On Wed, 28 May 2003, Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO wrote: > > > After this update, I found some error messages like this: > > > > > > acpi0: on motherboard > > > ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [\\_OS_] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND > > > ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0._INI] (Node 0xc21b73e0), AE_NOT_FOUND > > > > Please try the attached patch and see if it changes things for you. Same here, message is gone with the patch applied. For the functionality it doesn't seem to matter. Mark -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/ New Projects Group/TTM