Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 01:20:36 +0900 From: itojun@itojun.org To: rssh@cki.ipri.kiev.ua Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: about portlint Message-ID: <18040.867082836@itojun.csl.sony.co.jp> In-Reply-To: Ruslan Shevchenko <rssh@cki.ipri.kiev.ua>'s message of Mon, 23 Jun 1997 16:01:33 %2B0300. <33AE73AD.2C78@cki.ipri.kiev.ua> References: <33AE73AD.2C78@cki.ipri.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >+ one check:
>> > in *_DEPENDS ${PORTSDIR}/foo/bar
>> > better then /usr/ports/foo/bar
>> >(It is my coomon error;) )
>>
>> Okey I will add it. I should generalize this to check for:
>> - direct use of pathname /usr/local
>> - direct use of pathname /usr/X11R6
>> - direct use of pathname /usr/ports
>> in most places in the Makefile.
>> What else should we avoid?
>absolute pathnames in scripts.
how's this?
ftp://ftp.foretune.co.jp/pub/tools/portlint/portlint.pl-1.14
>(and flag for disable checking for some stupid
>configuration scripts, as in SR)
sorry to be dumb, what is referred to by SR?
itojun
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18040.867082836>